What are the different strategies for inheritance mapping in JPA?

Table of Contents

Introduction

In Java Persistence API (JPA), inheritance mapping is used to define how an inheritance hierarchy in the object-oriented model is represented in a relational database. This mapping determines how JPA will persist and retrieve data for parent and child entities in an inheritance hierarchy.

JPA provides three main strategies for inheritance mapping: Single Table, Joined, and Table-per-Class. Each of these strategies offers different ways to store inheritance hierarchies, and choosing the right one depends on factors like performance, database design, and the complexity of the inheritance relationships.

1. Single Table Inheritance Mapping (**@Inheritance(strategy = InheritanceType.SINGLE_TABLE)**)

In the Single Table strategy, all classes in the inheritance hierarchy are mapped to a single database table. This table contains columns for all fields from all classes in the hierarchy, including the parent class and any subclasses. A discriminator column is typically used to differentiate between the various types of entities stored in the table.

Key Characteristics:

  • Single table stores data for all classes in the hierarchy.
  • A discriminator column is added to the table to identify the type of each record.
  • No joins are required when querying, as all data is in one table.

Benefits:

  • Performance: Queries are fast because they don’t require joins.
  • Simplicity: The database schema is straightforward, with just one table for all classes.

Drawbacks:

  • Wasted space: If subclasses have many unique attributes, their data will be stored in columns that are often left null in other subclasses.
  • Potential for schema bloat: As the hierarchy grows, the single table can become very large and inefficient.

Example:

In this example:

  • The Animal, Dog, and Cat entities are stored in a single table.
  • A discriminator column (type) is used to distinguish between Dog and Cat records.

2. Joined Inheritance Mapping (**@Inheritance(strategy = InheritanceType.JOINED)**)

In the Joined strategy, each class in the inheritance hierarchy is mapped to its own separate table. The parent class’s table contains only the fields common to all subclasses, while each subclass has its own table with the fields specific to that subclass. These tables are joined together using SQL joins when querying the data.

Key Characteristics:

  • Each class in the hierarchy gets its own table.
  • The parent table contains common fields, while each subclass has a table for its own specific fields.
  • Queries use joins to retrieve data from the parent and subclass tables.

Benefits:

  • Normalized schema: No redundant columns; the schema is more flexible and can scale better for large hierarchies.
  • Efficient storage: Only the fields relevant to each class are stored in each table.

Drawbacks:

  • Performance overhead: Requires multiple table joins, which can affect query performance, especially in deep hierarchies.
  • Complexity: The database schema is more complex, and queries need to handle multiple tables.

Example:

In this example:

  • The Animal class is stored in its own table, with columns for id and name.
  • The Dog and Cat classes each have their own tables, which include only the fields specific to those classes (breed and lives).
  • JOIN operations are required to fetch data across the tables.

3. Table-Per-Class Inheritance Mapping (**@Inheritance(strategy = InheritanceType.TABLE_PER_CLASS)**)

In the Table-per-Class strategy, each class in the inheritance hierarchy is mapped to its own separate table, and each table includes all fields from both the parent and the subclass. Unlike the Joined strategy, where only the subclass fields are stored in the subclass table, the Table-per-Class strategy duplicates the parent class’s fields in each subclass’s table.

Key Characteristics:

  • Each class in the hierarchy gets its own table.
  • Each table contains all fields from the parent and subclass.
  • No joins are required, as each table is independent and contains complete data.

Benefits:

  • Simplified queries: No need for joins since each subclass has a complete table with all fields.
  • Avoids foreign key relationships: No need to maintain parent-child relationships via foreign keys.

Drawbacks:

  • Data redundancy: Parent class fields are duplicated in every subclass table, which can lead to inefficient storage.
  • Limited flexibility: Changes to the parent class can require changes to multiple subclass tables.

Example:

In this example:

  • The Dog and Cat tables both contain all the fields from Animal (i.e., id and name), along with the subclass-specific fields (breed and lives).
  • No joins are required when querying these tables, but the schema is less efficient due to redundancy.

4. @Inheritance Annotation in JPA

The @Inheritance annotation is used to specify the inheritance strategy for a JPA entity. The strategy attribute defines the strategy to use.

Available Inheritance Strategies:

  • SINGLE_TABLE: A single table is used for all classes in the hierarchy.
  • JOINED: Each class has its own table, with relationships between the tables maintained using joins.
  • TABLE_PER_CLASS: Each class has its own table, which includes all fields from the parent class and the subclass.

Conclusion

The choice of inheritance mapping strategy in JPA depends on the application’s needs, including performance considerations, the complexity of the inheritance hierarchy, and how the data is queried. Here’s a summary of when to use each strategy:

  • Single Table: Use when you need efficient querying and your entity hierarchy is not too deep or complex. Best for performance-sensitive applications.
  • Joined: Use when you want a normalized schema and need flexibility, but can tolerate the performance overhead of joins.
  • Table-per-Class: Use when you need to avoid joins and want each class to have its own table, but be aware of data redundancy.

By carefully selecting the appropriate inheritance mapping strategy, you can optimize both the design of your database and the performance of your JPA-based application.

Share
Similar Questions